Campus Rudolf Virchow Africa


Rudolf Virchow –

his ideology is the core discipline of this Campus and our Disciples:


Follow the Campus mantra, and qualify as a healer:

“Heal through the alleviation of poverty, not vaccines.”       

Rudolf Virchow –

Virchow was an impassioned advocate for social and political reform, His ideology involved social inequality as the cause of diseases that requires political actions, stating:

Medicine is a social science, and politics is nothing else but medicine on a large scale.

Medicine, as a social science, as the science of human beings, has the obligation to point out problems and to attempt their theoretical solution: the politician, the practical anthropologist, must find the means for their actual solution…

Science for its own sake, usually means nothing more than science for the sake of the people who happen to be pursuing it.

Knowledge which is unable to support action is not genuine; and how unsure is activity without understanding.

If medicine is to fulfil her great task, then she must enter the political and social life…

The physicians are the natural attorneys of the poor, and the social problems should largely be solved by them.

Healer Kavalo,

Disciple of Campus Rudolf Virchow Africa

The Ecosystem, after Coronavirus, is already celebrated thanks to lockdown, the elite see the blue skies, the far horizons, they remember what the world was like before pollution, the Corporates will work from home, if necessary use an electric car, and we we are left to do, is to make sure the Aborigine does not chop our oxygen producing trees down, and pollute the skies, like in the days of old.           

Please click on this link, to Rudolf Virchow background

Visit Soweto and Alexandra with Taste of Africa

Intent to exterminate Southern Africans?

Intent to exterminate Southern Africans, a conclusion that I made months ago, the politically correct norms, discourage me from publishing what I am thinking.

I have drafted the basis of my conclusions, since December 16, 2020, my book will never reach finality, before another 20 000 people die, so I need to fire another shot, in the Ivermectin debate.

When I started the research on December 16, 2020, I had asked the question;

“Why does South Africa, have the highest prevalence of HIV/AIDS in Africa, in the World?”

“Why does South Africa have 7 970 000 people living with HIV, and Madagascar, the Country with the magic herb, only 69 000?”

Once  upon a time, a friend of mine who was a South African Security Services agent, told me that he was based in Mozambique, from late 1980s, and he was part of a group, that infected the black  population, from Mozambique through the Johannesburg area, with HIV.

I did not want to throw my friend in the pile, unless I received confirmation from another source, this I get from friend Gordon, a struggle military veteran, he WhatsApps’ a video and a comment on the SAMIR inoculation.

I have no doubt that the security forces spread HIV from Mozambique, through South Africa to Angola, and my draft document shows that the WHO and all medical scientists, have not scientifically established the origins of HIC-1 C subgroup, the subgroup that resides in Southern Africa, clearly shown in the only dark high density area in the world:

HIV-1 C subgroup, Southern Africa
HIV-1 C subgroup, Southern Africa

My research into Ivermectin first follows the question, “Does Ivermectin benefit HIV infected patients?”

This takes me to the WHO prescribes Ivermectin treatment for the Africa Onchocerciasis Control Programme  AOCP


Ivermectin is taken orally as tablets. A single dose of 150 to 200 µg/kg body weight needs to be taken annually to be effective. The dosage depends on a person’s body mass, which can be simply calculated according to height.

Onchocerciasis occurs mainly in tropical areas. More than 99% of infected people live in 31 countries in sub-Saharan Africa: Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Republic of Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, South Sudan, Sudan, Togo, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania.

Onchocerciasis is also transmitted in Brazil, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) and Yemen.

These AfricaCountries, who receive an annual dose of Ivermectin, have very few Coronavirus Deaths?

In  the next able the centre column, Deaths / 100 000, South Africa has achieved a death rate of 58,413 per 100 000,

I question Equatorial Guinea’s management styles, but from Sudan down the list, their rates are all below 3,348 per 100 000.

These countries, have a total population of 1,08 billion, and the death rate of 1,051 per 100 000.


South Africa Coronavirus Deaths / 100 000 compared to AOCP countries
South Africa Coronavirus Deaths / 100 000 compared to AOCP countries

The BAREFOOT Scientist, suggests that a population group of 1,08 billion, who only have a 1,51  Covid-19 deaths per 100 000, is a sufficient sample, to prove that Ivermectin contributes to preventing Coronavirus Deaths, and the WHO and South African medical scientists, have no option, than to allow Ivermectin as a Coronavirus treatment in Southern Africa.

Any failure to do so, places the system at risk.


If the system fears claims from patients who elect Ivermectin treatment,  simple waiver avoid responsibility.

As part of my research into whether Ivermectin would help in the HIV infection rates, I believe that it would. We scrutinize Scrutinize the South African HIV prevalence rate of 13,6% of the population.

In the AOCP Countries, Mozambique, where SAIMR was based, have a 7,04% of the population living with HIV/AIDS, an indication that South Africa’s   HIV/AIDS prevalence could be a low as 7.04% if we had access to Ivermectin, reducing the HIV/AIDS population from 7 970 000 to as low as 4 350 000.

This will halve the State’s cost of HIV/AIDS treatment  by nearly 50%, and reduce the annual deaths from 200 000 to 100 000.

How can the WHO and South African medical science prevent the use of Ivermectin in South Africa?

These countries, have a total population of 1,08 billion, and the HIV prevalence  rate of 1,28% of the population.


Ivermectin impact on HIV prevalence
Ivermectin impact on HIV prevalence


I have observed many social media posts where a young black person, will claim that the  New World Conspiracy Theory, is to reduce the black population, population reduction can’t take place, without culling, or extermination, and if I was a black, I would believe that the Intent to exterminate Southern Africans was aimed at me?

President Ramaphosa, Professor Karrim, there is no scientific reason available to why Ivermectin is no safe to the human, there is no WHO medical treatment for Covid-19, if you have any hidden scientific research that I have missed that replaces the no , you, the elected and paid for by the people, owe i to us.

May I leave the target Zone in your minds for now:

HIV-1 C subgroup, Southern Africa
HIV-1 C subgroup, Southern Africa

Cedric de la Harpe      Taste of Africa


Campus Rudolf Virchow Africa

Coronavirus wonder drug Ivermectin banned

Coronavirus wonder drug Ivermectin banned in South Africa, the South Africans are dying, and they have no choice to whether they should use the tested Ivermectin or die, waiting for the medical science vaccine.



Medical Science has not found a treatment that can cure Coronavirus, yet, in the interest of an unproven vaccine in Africa, South Africa, bans the Coronavirus wonder drug Ivermectin.

I am of the opinion, that I have the human right to be treated with Ivermectin, and should this not happen when I need it, I will have been murdered.

According to the WHO, Ivermectin is safe to use, and is prescribed for Onchocerciasis, in Africa, for use for both local and international volunteers.

African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC)

I quote from the article:

The treatment for onchocerciasis is ivermectin (brand name Mectizan®). Unlike previous treatments, which had serious – sometimes fatal – side effects, ivermectin is safe and can be used on a wide scale.

It is also a very effective treatment, and has single-handedly transformed the lives of millions of people suffering from onchocerciasis since its introduction in 1987.

In APOC countries, it is estimated that 65% of the total population living in an endemic area need to take ivermectin annually to eliminate onchocerciasis as a public health problem.


In 1987, the manufacturer of ivermectin – Merck & Co., Inc. – declared that it would donate ivermectin free of charge for as long as is needed. This unprecedented donation is administered through the Mectizan Donation Program, which works with ministries of health and other partners to distribute the drug.

Onchocerciasis is evil, if we are no allowed Ivermectin for Coronavirus, then Coronavirus is not as evil;  

I quote from the article:


WHO recommends treating onchocerciasis with ivermectin at least once yearly for between 10 to 15 years. Where O. volvulus co-exists with Loa loa, treatment strategies have to be adjusted. Loa loa is a parasitic filarial worm that is endemic in Cameroon, the Central African Republic, Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Nigeria and South Sudan. Treatment of individuals with high levels of L. loa in the blood can sometimes result in severe adverse events. In affected countries, it is recommended to follow the Mectizan Expert Committee (MEC)/APOC recommendations for the management of severe adverse events.

This post is a public record, that I will request Ivermectin treatment from the Hospital that I am sent to, or that I approach, and should I not receive the treatment with Ivermectin, my legal team are waiting in the wings to claim restitution.

South African Citizen, who makes the averment that my human rights have been abused:

Cedric de la Harpe

ID 4705155127087



An open letter to Dr Tedros, #WHO.

An open letter to Dr Tedros, #WHO.

Dear @DrTedros 

I have abused my President the President of South Africa, when the questions I have been asking him, would be in your realm to answer?

I have personally heard you say, that the Coronavirus is not a flu, it is more deadly than any flu that the world has ever experienced. (granted, only heard on TV, and this could be fake news)  

Do you rate the Coronavirus,  more deadly than the 1918 Spanish Flu, which killed 2% of the African population, including  6,6% of the South African black population, a total of 300 000 black souls died in 42 days, a healthy labour force, aged between 18 and 40 years-old.

This leads me to my next question;

“Both the USA and United Kingdom, and attempting to assess why the Coronavirus is proportionately killing more black people than whites? Does the have any opinion on this quandary?”

I ask this question, as South Africa’s 1918 Spanish Flu experience was that only 11 000 whites died, only 0,88% of the white population.

As an aged white South African, would this ratio still apply during the Coronavirus, if not, why not?

I have attempted to answer my own questions with regard to the comparison between Coronavirus and Influenza, the USA appears to have published their last flu death tally on March 14, 2020, and Italy, published their last flu death tally on January 23, 2020.

My conclusion to the comparison between Coronavirus and Influenza, is that it will take the medical researchers and statisticians, five years of research, to establish whether the Coronavirus victims, would be part of the seasonal influenza / pneumonia death tallies in the world.

My assessment, is that the 2020 statistics for both Coronavirus and Flu, would fall within the maximum 5 years limits over the past five years occurrences.

One last question, 

“Do you accept that we, the South African community, by sacrificing our economy, our livelihoods, many starving, will have saved tens of thousands of lives.

Your answers and guidance will be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards

Cedric de la Harpe